...we've got five children under the age of five, one camera, half
of a gig's worth of space on a compact flash card, it's still light out
and we're wearing matching shirts.
Hit it.
Very Mom's post about photoshopping her two kids together and Suburban Bliss's discussion of photo problems with kids reminded me of my favorite picture of my son and his four cousins (ages 5, 3, 18m, 18m, 1).
With digital, getting good shots of just one kid isn't too hard, you
just keep shooting and throw away the bad ones. With two, it's tricky
but can be done. With five (under the age of 5, no less)... there's
just no point once they're all mobile.
Here's our first casual attempt when we only had four, July 2003:
Not exactly a rousing success. So six months later, when there were
five and we were all together again, we resolved to try for real this
time, in our home studio:
Not too bad... the littlest one was too young to smile and the
middle two weren't mobile yet, although my son was too busy trying to
swallow his fist to smile and the eldest two were old enough to hear
and then ignore directions.
Fast forward another six months, all five are plenty mobile, and try again ("they just don't get it, do they?"):
This time it's the littlest one (by age, that is, not girth due to
my little runt) trying to stuff something into her craw, my boy's
pissed that mom hasn't figured out that pictures of five kids together
just don't work, #2 is angelic and #1 is trying to stop #4 from
escaping while probably wishing he could do the same.
Eh. So finally, when we had them all together again this past
September, I resolved to try it again but this time with a lot lower
stress. So we did a little photo math:
+
+
+
=
<drumroll>...

When people see this print on my door, everyone wants to know how I got
five kids to pose like that for one shot. When I tell them the story,
their next reaction is "Oh, you can tell it's a composite because #4 is
abnormally large" and I tell them no, he actually is that big.