Question: What do you think about this month's cover of the Profiles In Diversity Journal?
Recent Posts
- A story Jared wrote
- Probably not what they intended...
- The cutiest
- Did you know, the benches at McDonalds aren't level?
- Well, that's very... precise
- Word Twist and I just don't share dictionaries
- I'll take 'Things you don't want your 3 year old to say' for $400, Alex
- Apparently I am not smarter than a fifth grader
- Yes, it's a poop story.
- Run half marathon: check
« Why do my relatives assume I think like them? | Main | Early breastfeeding experiences »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9c1a53ef00d83462863e69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Answer: Somebody missed the point.:
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
I don't know - looks like they are about par for the course. If the issue is "rich white guys" (RWG) on the cover that seems to be what a majority of their covers are.
Look at their last 13 issues (including current) - they feature 15 RWG and 14 "others". But it has to be noted that 7 of those 14 are on a single cover and that 1 of the others is an "incidental" background actor.
I also find it interesting that of the 14 "others" there are only 2 men.
So while the numbers are relatively even the real story is that month-to-month the typical cover solely features one or more RWG's.
This says more about diversity at the executive management level than anything else.
Posted by: Bob | October 08, 2004 at 11:47 AM
Agreed.
Posted by: KC Lemson | October 08, 2004 at 09:53 PM