Question: What do you think about this month's cover of the Profiles In Diversity Journal?
Recent Posts
- A story Jared wrote
- Probably not what they intended...
- The cutiest
- Did you know, the benches at McDonalds aren't level?
- Well, that's very... precise
- Word Twist and I just don't share dictionaries
- I'll take 'Things you don't want your 3 year old to say' for $400, Alex
- Apparently I am not smarter than a fifth grader
- Yes, it's a poop story.
- Run half marathon: check
« Why do my relatives assume I think like them? | Main | Early breastfeeding experiences »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c9c1a53ef00d83462863e69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Answer: Somebody missed the point.:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
I don't know - looks like they are about par for the course. If the issue is "rich white guys" (RWG) on the cover that seems to be what a majority of their covers are.
Look at their last 13 issues (including current) - they feature 15 RWG and 14 "others". But it has to be noted that 7 of those 14 are on a single cover and that 1 of the others is an "incidental" background actor.
I also find it interesting that of the 14 "others" there are only 2 men.
So while the numbers are relatively even the real story is that month-to-month the typical cover solely features one or more RWG's.
This says more about diversity at the executive management level than anything else.
Posted by: Bob | October 08, 2004 at 11:47 AM
Agreed.
Posted by: KC Lemson | October 08, 2004 at 09:53 PM